Are you Brand Building Out of Order? A Cautionary Tale

As a content marketer, you want to dive in and start work immediately. You know it’s best to lock in a brand position but you wonder: is this so important?

Consider: would you build a skyscraper with no blueprint or do a heart by-pass with no diagnosis?

Here’s the story of one Chicago-based private-equity firm with whom I worked that I’ll call Gaga Capital. They learned the hard way what can happen when the work is done out of order.

Their Problem: No Compelling Story

Gaga Capital had been in business for 15 years, but their marketing efforts were off course. They had a solid track record, yet no compelling corporate story. As a result, principals weren’t closing deals as the industry became more commoditized.

They had to slow down. Discover what they stood for. Get serious about branding.

Mistake #1: Isolated market research

Gaga hired a market research firm to look at competitors and talk to Gaga staff about internal brand perceptions. Good first steps. But, the research firm was not hired to develop a strategic positioning. They offered a few casual ideas; i.e., Gaga should lead with being “women owned,” which is unique in financial services. However, without a positioning--what the brand stood for relative to core attributes–this clever suggestion for helping Gaga stand out was neither strategic nor relevant.

Mistake #2: Design before positioning

Gaga then hired a design firm to create the look and feel for a new website. Again, they were branding out of order because design must follow strategy. Positioning should give birth to verbal content, which should then give birth to visuals and design. Designing without a strategic blueprint is like building a bicycle without knowing the age, height, sex, and bank account of the potential rider.

The designers created clichéd business images–skylines and conferences tables, standard for many financial web sites–and the first drafts were lackluster.

Changing course: Starting with strategy

Gaga realized there was something missing. They hired a qualified brand-positioning firm, and the work started over. While some of the initial research findings were used, the new branding firm again interviewed principals to unearth Gaga’s real story.

The branding firm rooted Gaga’s competitive value in its unusual corporate history, and how it nurtured relationships with portfolio companies.

The right next steps

With the new positioning in place, Gaga scrapped all design efforts and approached their branding effort in a logical order:

  1. The branding firm developed verbal content, messaging, and a tag line.
  2. With strategy and content in place, designers chose a visual theme for the site.
  3. Designers created a new logo to express Gaga’s true attributes.
  4. A press release focused on Gaga’s new identity.
  5. The firm wrote a capabilities brochure.

If Gaga had started with a positioning statement, the natural branding sequence would have saved them countless dollars and months of work.

As a content marketer, what problems have you encountered when branding “out of order”? Share them in the comments!

This entry was posted in Content Marketing Case Studies, Developing a Strategy and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Author: Eileen Sutton

Sutton Creative's principal, Eileen Sutton, is a writer and brand consultant who helps the world’s leading financial firms clarify their story, improve materials, and pursue business better. She relies on holistic principles to help firms get out from under their numbers and speak in a human cadence across integrated channels. Part of a creative ecosystem, she also teams with award-winning Willoughby Partners, Dreisbach Design & T3 Publishing.

Other posts by

  • Join Over 15,000 of Your Peers!

    Get daily articles and news delivered to your email inbox and get CMI’s exclusive ebook FREE. Attract and Retain Customers with Content Marketing.

    *

  • http://twitter.com/joey_strawn Joey Strawn

    This is a great post. I see it so often people have a “neat idea” for a logo design or stationary that totally goes against who they think they are as a company. It's important, as this post suggests, to follow the actual path of creativity when you are designing a story/identity for a company or brand.

  • http://www.kobayashi.ca Brent Kobayashi

    Hello Eileen,

    Thank you for the post.

    We mostly work with small businesses, and in the past, the strategy was even more shallow than you've described. As the designers, we would work to discover what the client was all about (and were amazed to find that long-time businesses never really thought much about this – until they wanted to build a website).

    About two years ago, we had the pleasure to work on a slightly larger project with a wonderful brand strategist (Sharon Freedman of twenty-six keys). And for the first time we had a strategic brief with copy, key messages, and guidelines on what the design needed to achieve (and design suggestions). Wow – design (and even build) flowed beautifully from that point forward.

    These days, we don't get to start every project with proper strategy – but boy do we ever want to (for our clients sake!). At the very least we communicate to our clients that “design does not equal brand” then try to work within their budget to at least get them heading in the right direction.

    Have a great day!

  • Fernando Labastida

    I did a project with a client a while ago, and the problem I encountered was that the strategic research and brand positioning that we did was shallow. We did interviews with clientes, and we interviewed company executives. Althought the story was compelling, and what the clients told us was interesting, it just didn't seem to have any punch to it. It sounded like all other stories.

    I think some of the mistakes we did were

    1. We only interviewed the IT people who implemented the solution (this was a B2b software-as–service product oriented towards small businesses), and not the business beneficiaries. We found the surface pains and solutions “we could do xxx in less time”, but not the business impact things “we saved XX” or “we increased our revnues by xxx” or more importantly, “we became a more nimble, flexible business.”

    2. We didn't analyze the customer base to see if there was a pattern that indicated vertical expertise or preference. I suspected we had a lot more wholesale distribution customers and could get some good stories there that we could use to create a vertically focused positioning and brand strategy, but the CEO didn't want to do that. He wanted to hid the generic “SMB” market, and the end result was that we ended up looking like every other company in our space.

    3. I could never get the executives of the company to share their deep knowledge of how their software reallly helps companies other than generic “we help them save money and increase revenues.” They've been around for 10 years, and created this technology from scratch, so I know they knew more than they let on, but they were too busy to really spend quality time communicating that to me, and I also think they didn't consider it important. They've always been a sales-oriented company, and previous marketing efforts they had tried had always failed, so in this latest attempt to do marketing (by hiring me) they were always suspicous and skeptical.

    4. Finally, they wanted to start doing marketing campaigns without first trying to get beta customers for their new product in the United States (the company is a foreign company and were very successful in their home country, but just starting to enter the U.S.). I think they should have done what all startups do: get some initial beta customers, work with them to improve, tweak customize or totally change the product, and then come out with a better, unique offering instead of the generic one that just looked like about 30 other offerings in the marketplace.

    That's my .02 cents worth.

  • Eileen Sutton

    Fernando, Brent, Joey, wonderful comments and observations. Thanks so much. Lots of brands across industries have a weak foundation because they've ignored making decisions for years. (What does McDonald’s actually stand for these days?) Often, brands want to be all things to all people (i.e., McDonald's selling vegeburgers.) Memorable branding is about creating a narrow focus, claiming a slim piece of real estate in a prospect's mind. (Volvo = safety. Apple = innovation.) Creating a positioning is also not technical. It doesn't involve features and benefits of products and services. It goes deeper. Just as you describe a friend as tall, brown hair, great laugh, loves pizza, the goal when positioning is to establish primary attributes–the brand’s DNA–and launch the corporate story from that essential skeleton. And yes, it's important to talk to all stake-holders. I recently positioned an asset management start-up. Although a brand new firm (with veteran financial players), the process was identical. They had clear intentions. These intentions became core attributes, which gave birth to a compelling, unique story. A few years from now, their core story might evolve.

  • Diane Baranello

    Eileen, this is a great post … you offer a compelling blueprint for 'brand forward' thinking and strategic positioning.

    Working with emerging leaders, I encourage them to dig deep for their real story as they build their brand. Your caution about building brand in a logical order and your 5 steps strategy is one I will be mindful of. Many thanks.

  • Eileen Sutton

    Diane, thanks so much for your comment. The hardest part is getting companies to get serious about their “story” to start with. Brands often get to the 10- or 15-year mark and realize they've done little to tell their story coherently across channels. At some point it catches up to them, and they're headed downstream without the proverbial paddle.

  • http://twitter.com/brentkobayashi Brent Kobayashi

    Hi Eileen – you are welcome & thank you for the great dialogue.

    I have found that even with our small business having a brand that comes from a core doesn't just help communicate with our clients/potential clients, but also helps operationally and strategically.

    When we stray from our articulated brand we feel the resistance. Perhaps this is where some of the resistance to the brand process inherently comes from? Are the stakeholders reluctant to stake their turf for fear it might be the wrong turf? Are they reluctant to let go of an opportunistic approach to business development in exchange for picking a point on the horizon & saying “that's where we are going”?

    Following whatever opportunity comes along seems rewarding – I've done plenty of that!. However, it sure is hard to build momentum when you are turning corners all the time.